Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts

Sunday, July 29, 2018

[Insert Witty Blog Post Title Here]

Whew...Is anyone else exhausted after this past week? Perhaps it’s the pressure from trying to wrap up the produsage assignment amidst technical difficulties (why would I expect anything technology related to be 100% hiccup free?) or the fact that we just wrapped up the 5th week of social media tools (seriously, how many can there be?). Either way, my brain is effectively drained, hence my super clever title for this post.


So for part of my produsage assignment I thought it would be great to incorporate a Twitter feed from a hashtag search, pretty much like the one in the sidebar on the EME6414 Web 2.0 blog page that displays a running feed of #eme6414. Sounds easy enough right? At least that’s what I thought when I embarked on the task only to discover many hours later that it would be impossible...at least to accomplish natively through Twitter.

I learned the technical term for what I was after was a search timeline widget - a fancy snippet of HTML code that is able to pull all the results of a hashtag search and display them in a chronological timeline. I also learned that Twitter deprecated (fancy word meaning to declare some technological feature or function to be obsolescent) the search timeline widget on July 27, 2018. Coincidentally, the very same day that I was trying to figure out how to create one! For anyone curious, you can check out the original announcement from June 2016 on the developer's forum here. Since then, Twitter has introduced a new way to generate code for embedding tweets, but sadly, not for search timelines.

I then proceeded to spend a good chunk of the next day determined to find an alternative solution to my problem. I had decided early in the week to take a break from the participation aspect this week (thank you Token #2!) but I still found myself elbow deep in trying new tools. My inbox was overflowing with activation emails for dozens of promising tools I had signed up for, and if it wasn’t for Google chrome dutifully remembering my login credentials, there is no way I would have survived. Although it wasn’t perfect and it took way longer than I expected it to, I did eventually achieved success in creating a search timeline widget. My solution was not pretty and I’m still trying to understand why it worked, but nevertheless I’m proud of the fact that I got it to work.

When I started writing this blog post I wasn’t entirely sure where I was going to end up. I had jotted down some notes to talk about how after 5 weeks of social media indoctrination my initial reaction to my problem was to seek out help through social media and how it seemed to share some similarities with the community of practice of teachers described in the Goodyear, Casey & Kirk (2014) article. Or how even though I told myself to take a break from participation I had to really fight the urge to connect as the number of unread posts on my feed reader climbed higher and higher. But I think the moral of this story is to not take all of these Web 2.0 tools and the technology that went into creating them for granted. We are fortunate to have so many options at our disposal for fostering community and engagement in the classroom or the workplace that we don't even really stop and think about the marvel of technical engineering that goes into creating them; but I think that we should.  So the next time you come across a particularly awesome piece of computing genius take a moment to stop and thank a developer.  

Monday, July 2, 2018

Social Media as Discourse

I was swiping through the top news stories this morning when I came across this article on USA Today about a woman who had posted pictures of herself posing with a black giraffe she had killed during a hunt in South Africa. I bring this up, not to debate the ethics of hunting animals for sport, but rather to discuss the reactions that played out over social media in response to the pictures.

The post that started it all was made two years ago on June 22, 2017 by a woman named Tess Thompson Talley. I don’t know what kind of media buzz the post generated back then, but it sparked a firestorm when it was shared by the news media outlet AfricaDigest (@africlandpost) on June 16, 2018. Since then, the post has been retweeted 38,581 times, has 22,467 likes and generated 5.8K comments. It’s even spawned its own hashtag (#TessThompsonTalley) which, according to Hashtags.org analytics, in the past 24 hours was up to an estimated 155 tweets per hour.

Suffice it to say, all the attention is not good. Keyhole, another social media analytics tool shows that the sentiment in 63% of  the posts using this hashtag are negative while only 15% are positive with another 22% neutral.
Word cloud made up of keywords being used with #TessThompsonTalley
One prominent tweet that has since been removed, encouraged viewers to share the link to her Facebook profile and “give her as much abuse as possible!” Another Twitter user called for followers to “name and shame this grotesque excuse for a human being.”

The article then goes on to quote a tweet from actor Ricky Gervais and an Instagram post from actress Debra Messing criticizing Talley’s actions which has so far earned 129,644 and 31,150 likes, respectively. This is a very controversial topic that has elicited some very strong emotions on both sides of the argument, but what is it that prompts individuals to join in the conversation in the first place? What is it that motivates someone to throw in their 2 cents?

Bruns (2007) states in his article Beyond Difference: Reconfiguring Education for the User-Led Age that, “the social capital stemming from recognition for one’s contributions to the produsage process (at least amongst peers, if not on a wider stage) can be a significant motivation for participation in produsage, and must be identified as such.” Does this sufficiently explain the viral status of #TessThompsonTalley? Are we all still just after our 15 minutes of fame, 140 characters at a time?

I posed a similar question recently in a comment to another blog post but does a platform like Twitter actually encourage genuine discourse or does it simply give those with an already loud voice an even bigger audience? Does Twitter and other social media outlets promote a diversity of opinion or does it perpetuate a herd mentality? If you have any thoughts on the issue please feel free to leave a comment.